Life Extension
CITIZENS PETITION
TO:
FDA- Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305)
12420 Parklawn Drive, Room 1-23
Rockville, MD 20857

RE: [Docket No. 98N-0044] RIN 0910-AA59 Regulations on Statements Made for Dietary Supplements Concerning the Effect of the Product on the Structure or Function of the Body; Proposed Rule and Dietary Supplements: Comments on Report of the Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels; Notice

Please be advised that I vehemently oppose the proposed restrictions on the dissemination of medical information as it relates to dietary supplement health claims for the following reasons:

  1. I need this information to determine what supplements I should take and which supplements I should avoid. Your restriction on the types of claims that can be made will adversely effect my health, and the health of the millions of Americans who rely on the dissemination of specific medical information relating to disease states in order to determine which dietary supplements to take.
  2. Your proposed rules are in violation of the free speech provisions enumerated in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
  3. Your proposed rules are contrary to a Supreme Court decision on June 28, 1993. The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (whose advice you were following when you drafted your proposed rule) defied the Supreme Court Decision of Daubert v. Merrill Dow. ( I hereby put you on notice that the FDA is required to abide by Supreme Court decisions when proposing new regulations.)
  4. In your proposed rule, you say that it would be illegal to suggest anything but drugs to reduce nausea associated with chemotherapy. This is arbitrary and capricious. What about nutrients such as ginger that have been shown to reduce nausea? What about coenzyme Q10 and vitamin E to reduce chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathies, melatonin to reduce chemotherapy-induced immune system damage, and N-acetylcysteine to reduce chemotherapy induced liver damage? Are cancer patients to be denied this information?

Because your proposed rule is of questionable legality in view of the Daubert decision, and will cause many Americans to suffer and die, I hereby call for its immediate withdrawal.

Signed:____________________________________________ Date:_______________
Address:_______________________________________________________________
City/State/Zip:___________________________________________________________

CC: To my U.S. representative and two senators


All Contents Copyright © 1995-2009 Life Extension Foundation All rights reserved.

Life Extension

These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. The information provided on this site is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other health care professional or any information contained on or in any product label or packaging. You should not use the information on this site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any medication or other treatment. You should consult with a healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise or supplementation program, before taking any medication, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem. You should not stop taking any medication without first consulting your physician.