Weight Loss Sale

Life Extension Magazine

LE Magazine July 2008
As We See It

The FDA Indicts Itself

By William Faloon
William Faloon
William Faloon
The FDA Indicts Itself

Some people enjoy saying “I told you so.” I cannot under these circumstances. What you are going to read is too barbaric for me to brag that we knew it was going on all along.

Back in the early 1980s, Life Extension predicted horrific tragedies if government control over health care was not abolished. The heartbreaking fact is that tens of millions of Americans have needlessly suffered and died because of FDA incompetence… and the FDA now admits its own incompetence!

These tens of millions of lives lost are not statistics of strangers. Virtually everyone reading this column has family or friends who have been victimized by dangerous drugs or denied access to life-saving ones.

Rather than boasting that every flaw we identified about the FDA is now a documented reality, I instead view it as a failure that we could not persuade Congress to abolish the FDA’s totalitarian powers decades ago. We certainly tried.

FDA Uncovers its Own Inadequacies

I have appeared on hundreds of talk shows to expose how the FDA, in collusion with pharmaceutical giants and conventional medical orthodoxy, is the leading cause of suffering and death in the United States.

FDA Uncovers its Own Inadequacies

Back in the early days, the FDA would defend its position by proclaiming that it served to protect the public’s health. An endless number of well-publicized scandals have caused the FDA itself to admit that it is incapable of carrying out its mission.1-10

If all the FDA did was act so cautiously that it almost never approved a dangerous drug, then at least the agency could point to some consumer value it provides. Instead, we are plagued by an antiquated regulatory agency that stifles the development of novel life-saving medications, while allowing a slew of drugs to be sold that have cumulatively cost millions of lives.

Americans thus suffer the “worst of both worlds” as they are poisoned by FDA-sanctioned prescription drugs, but denied the fruits of novel approaches to disease prevention and treatment.

The FDA’s Indictment of Itself

In response to a barrage of criticisms, FDA commissioner Dr. Edward von Eschenbach requested that a special committee assess whether the FDA is capable of doing its job. The premise for the FDA’s massive audit of itself was the fear that “the nation is at risk if FDA science is at risk.”11

Reader’s Digest Asks...

“What’s Ailing the FDA?”

Reader’s Digest is a venerable publication that often publishes pro-government articles. In response to the FDA’s admission of its own incompetence and incapability, Reader’s Digest published a special report titled What’s Ailing the FDA? Here is an excerpt from this Reader’s Digest special report:

“Recent headlines have uncovered one shocking lapse after another at the Food and Drug Administration...Many of the nation’s leading doctors, scientists and lawmakers now agree that the FDA is in crisis...Lurching from one disaster to another, the 102-year-old agency learns of dangers too late and then moves too slow to remedy them...Instead of depending on the FDA, Americans are doubting it—and for good reason.”25

The following are exact quotes from this 60-page report, titled FDA Science and Mission at Risk:11

  1. The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak.

  2. The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific workforce does not have sufficient capacity and capability.

  3. The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its information technology (IT) infrastructure is inadequate.

  4. The FDA does not have the capacity to ensure the safety of food for the nation.

  5. The development of medical products based on “new science” cannot be adequately regulated by the FDA.

  6. There is insufficient capacity in modeling, risk assessment, and analysis.

  7. The FDA science agenda lacks a coherent structure and vision, as well as effective coordination and prioritization.

  8. The FDA has substantial recruitment and retention challenges.

  9. The FDA has an inadequate and ineffective program for scientist performance.

  10. The FDA has not taken sufficient advantage of external and internal collaborations.

  11. The FDA lacks the information science capability and information infrastructure to fulfill its regulatory mandate.

  12. The FDA cannot provide the information infrastructure support to regulate products based on new science.

Most appalling is the FDA’s own finding that it “cannot even keep up with the advances in science.”11 Said differently, this means that the FDA cannot keep up with scientific breakthroughs that could cumulatively save millions of human lives!

Responses to the FDA’s Damning Report of Itself

The Wall Street Journal wrote an editorial titled “The Real FDA Scandal” and quoted the following about the FDA’s admitted statement:

Responses to the FDA’s Damning Report of Itself

“Particularly in complex and specialized fields like genomics and biotechnology medicine, the FDA lacks the basic competence ‘to understand the impact of product use, to maintain ongoing currency with their evolution or to evaluate the sophisticated products produced’ and ‘to support innovation in the industries and markets that it regulates.’”12

The Wall Street Journal further wrote, “Think about that: We live amid a revolution in biology, but the FDA still thinks like it did when Sputnik launched.”12

Dr. David Kessler was the most publicly recognized FDA commissioner of all time. Dr. Kessler is still sought out by the media as a proponent on FDA issues. In response to this horrific report, however, Dr. Kessler stated, “The problems are way bigger than one commissioner…I’m not sure how anybody could do this job now.”13

FDA commissioner Eschenbach stated, “I think to do what we need to do requires substantially more dollars than what has been invested in the FDA so far…This is a systemic overhaul that must go on for years.”13

Excerpt from 60-page Report

FDA Science and Mission at Risk

The FDA’s indictment of itself should frighten anyone concerned about medical progress being held hostage by an admittedly incompetent government agency.

The report titled FDA Science and Mission at Risk states “the world of drug discovery and development has undergone revolutionary change,” but the FDA’s “evaluation methods have remained largely unchanged over the last half century.”11

Problems are Worse Than FDA Admits

In doing the research to write this editorial, I uncovered many recent reports from outside organizations harshly critical of the FDA. These reports made national news for a day or two and were then quickly forgotten.14-24

We at Life Extension cannot pretend these problems disappear the day after the news reports them. That’s because we are on the front lines every single day battling to keep our aging members alive and in good heath.

Problems are Worse Than FDA Admits

Our greatest impediment to saving human lives is an incompetent and corrupt federal bureaucracy that is strangling medical innovation, especially in the areas of genomics and biotechnology where breakthroughs in anti-aging medicine are most expected.

I routinely talk with scientists about methods to significantly extend our life spans, but the problem with “the FDA” inevitably arises. If the FDA’s bureaucratic roadblock is not torn down, we may all succumb to a disease that liberated scientists could readily prevent or cure.

Please know that there is not a magic immortality pill that the FDA is directly suppressing. Instead, the FDA is restraining the ability for medical science to progress. This is no longer just my opinion. The FDA itself admits it cannot keep up with advances in science. So discoveries that could save human lives are not getting approved by the FDA and the cost is thousands of American lives being lost each day.

What Can be Done to Stop This Carnage?

There are a number of proposls to turn around this lethal barrier to medical progress called the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Some politicians say throw more tax dollars at the problem, while other politicians refuse to reward an agency with so much documented incompetence.

We at Life Extension look at the hard science and the free market as the best solution to quickly end this bureaucratic abomination. Unlike scholars who leisurely debate the best way to reform the FDA, Life Extension is obligated to represent the health interests of our aging members today!

What Can be Done to Stop This Carnage?

The FDA’s own report makes it clear that scientific innovation is suffocated by bureaucratic red tape and incompetency. Yet a medical renaissance is needed if our generation is to achieve dramatically extended life spans.

The only way to liberate scientific ingenuity is to allow Americans to obtain therapies that are clearly marked “Not approved by the FDA.” Under this free market scenario, those who want the so-called “protection” the FDA previously pretended it provided could continue receiving it.

Enlightened individuals and their doctors, on the other hand, would be able to choose novel therapies that are clearly labeled “Not approved by the FDA.”

Since it costs so much for a new drug to be approved, therapies that do not have to go through this arduous (and antiquated) approval process would cost less than outlandishly priced “approved” prescription drugs.

Don’t Let Medical Innovation be Held Hostage to FDA Bureaucracy!

Back in 2003, Life Extension initiated a poll on a website that has about 400,000 new visitors each month.26 The people visiting this site are not part of any anti-FDA group, nor were they exposed to anti-FDA teachings. These people were asked a simple question as to whether terminally ill cancer patients should have the right to any drug that might save their life. The results after 22,506 votes were tabulated are given in the box below.

Results from Poll of 400,000 People regarding Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

Should have access to any drug that might save their life: 89%

Should only have access to drugs approved by the FDA: 11%

We live in a constitutional republic where the people’s wishes are supposed to be adhered to (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others). If 89% of the American public thinks terminal cancer patients should have access to any drug that could save their life, then there is no reason for the law not to be changed to allow Americans to access therapies “Not approved by the FDA.”

Companies that engage in fraud could be prosecuted under consumer protection laws that already exist. The FDA could post its opinion about the safety and efficacy of unapproved therapies on its website (www.fda.gov). The civil litigation risks to companies that knowingly sell bogus products would preclude large-scale unsavory activities that some are concerned with. The greater fear Americans face is being diagnosed with a lethal disease only to find out that a cure is nowhere in sight.

Reactions to the FDA’s Confession

The FDA’s admission that it cannot do its job has stirred up a hornet’s nest of outrage from organizations who have long argued that the FDA is the greatest impediment to the advancement of medical science.

A new bill has been drafted that is being presented by health freedom activists to our friends in Congress. Passage of this bill into law will liberate Americans from the FDA’s nearly 50-year tyrannical rule over what therapies an individual is allowed to choose to remain alive.

The name of this proposed bill is the Life Extending Therapies Access Act of 2008. For those who like to read legal verbiage, a copy of this bill can be accessed at www.stopfda.com.

A remarkable number of divergent health organizations are finally recognizing the lethal consequences of ignoring the FDA’s ineptitudes and have committed to backing this legislation.

Email Your Congressional Representative and the Presidential Candidates

American citizens deserve the right to choose what goes into their bodies. Those who prefer therapies that are “Not approved by the FDA” should be allowed to do so, especially now that the FDA has come to the conclusion that it is too incapable and incompetent to keep up with scientific advances.

You can easily email your Congressional Representatives and let them know you want the law changed in order to liberate the fruits of scientific research. To send the special letter we prepared to Congress by email, just log on to www.stopfda.com.

For those without a computer, a form letter that can be mailed to your members of Congress appears on the next page.

The greatest threat to your health is citizen apathy. Please stand up for your fundamental right to access novel medical therapies by informing Congress of

the urgent need to amend the law to enable Americans to access treatments that are clearly labeled “Not Approved by the FDA.”

For longer life,

For Longer Life

William Faloon

References

1. Available at: http://www.naturalnews.com/002157.html. Accessed March 19, 2008.

2. Available at: http://www.drugresearcher.com/news/ng.asp?id=58116-fda-in-the. Accessed March 19, 2008.

3. Available at: http://www.drugresearcher.com/news/ng.asp?id=60304-whistleblowers-reveal-fda. Accessed March 19, 2008.

4. Available at: http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/00680/ketek-scandal.html. Accessed March 19, 2008.

5. Available at: http://www.mises.org/story/1805. Accessed March 19, 2008. Accessed March 19, 2008.

6. Available at: http://www.ghchealth.com/the-aspartame-scandal.html. Accessed March 19, 2008.

7. Available at: http://healthcarescandals.wordpress.com/category/fda/. Accessed March 19, 2008.

8. Available at: http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/health.info/twninfohealth034.htm. Accessed March 19, 2008.

9. Available at: http://www.naturalnews.com/002439.html. Accessed March 19, 2008.

10. Available at: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE4DD1E38F930A2575BC0A96F948260. Accessed March 19, 2008.

11. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/07/briefing/2007-4329b_02_01_FDA%20Report%20on%20Science%20and%20Technology.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2008.

12. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120225742208745785.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks. Accessed March 20, 2008.

13. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120407552925595245.html?mod=distsmartbrief&apl=y&r=49040. Accessed March 20, 2008.

14. Available at: http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/15/news/companies/fda/index.htm. Accessed March 21, 2008.

15. Available at: http://www.safecosmetics.org/your_health/index.cfm. Accessed March 21, 2008.

16. Available at: http://www.cspinet.org/foodsafety/. Accessed March 21, 2008

17. Available at: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5599197/GAO-report-criticizes-FDA-drug.html. Accessed March 21, 2008.

18. Available at: http://ahrp.blogspot.com/2008/03/gao-to-investigate-fda-review-process.html. Accessed March 21, 2008

19. Available at: http://www.newsinferno.com/archives/2585. Accessed March 21, 2008.

20. Available at: http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/46/28/. Accessed March 21, 2008.

21. Available at: http://www.uspirg.org/uspirg.asp?id2=24595. Accessed March 21, 2008.

22. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3793/26341/37329.aspx. Accessed March 21, 2008.

23. Available at: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/aug/06082405.html. Accessed March 21, 2008.

24. Available at: http://www.psrast.org/bghsalmonella.htm. Accessed March 21, 2008.

25. Available at: http://www.rd.com/national-interest/special-reports-and-surveys/problems-in-the-fda/article55513-1.html. Accessed April 16, 2008.

26. Available at: www.deathclock.com. Accessed March 21, 2008.