LEF Magazine April 1998
Please Co-sponsor the Consumer Health Free Speech Act (HR
2868)
TO: The Honorable ____________________
United States House of Representatives
Washington, D.C., 20515
Dear Congressional Representative:
The Consumer Health Free Speech Act, recently introduced
into the House by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), is needed to
preserve freedom of choice in health care in the United
States. This will help Americans learn about the scientific
advances in nutrition occurring today by allowing truthful
health claims for foods and dietary supplements. The bill
proposes the following changes:
FIRST: The present definition of the term "drug" in the
Food Drug & Cosmetic Act (FDCA) is so overly broad that it
includes foods, herbs and dietary supplements. The present
flawed definition reads: "The term 'drug' means articles
intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation,
treatment, or prevention of disease in man . . ."
Congressman Paul's bill would add three words, "other than
food," immediately following the word "articles," so that it
would read:
"The term 'drug' means articles, other than food, intended
for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or
prevention of disease in man . . ."
Adding these three words would exempt all foods (which
includes herbs and other dietary supplements) from being
regulated as drugs by the FDA. It would also prevent the FDA
from banning truthful health claims based upon scientific
evidence for these foods simply because they haven't been
approved as "drug" claims by the FDA.
Scientific research in nutrition has shown that herbs and
other dietary supplements are safe and effective in preventing
many diseases. However, the flawed definition of the term drug
makes it a federal crime for the dietary supplement industry
to give this truthful information to consumers in labeling
herbs or other dietary supplements.
SECOND: Wording in section 403 of the FDCA gives the FDA
excessive powers over herbs and dietary supplements. It
proclaims, "A food shall be deemed to be misbranded if its
labeling is false or misleading in any particular . . ."
The Consumer Health Free Speech Act would change "false or
misleading" to "false and misleading." Changing the "or" to
"and" will set a higher and fairer standard that the FDA must
meet before limiting or banning the sale of herbs or other
dietary supplements by claiming they present an unreasonable
"risk."
Name ___________________________ Date_________________
Address________________________________________________
City ________________________________________
State_____
Zip ___________________
Back to the
Magazine Forum
|