| References | Disclaimer | Abstracts | Print Version
Cancer Adjuvant Therapy
Women with polymorphisms (genetic variations) of the vitamin D receptor
gene may be less able to benefit from the nutrient. There is some evidence
that vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms play a role in the breast cancer
(Bretherton-Watt et al. 2001); however, recent studies do not support
this evidence (Buyru et al. 2003).
Identifying the at-risk groups, through the assessment of genetic variations
in the vitamin D receptor, appears to be a forthcoming tool for planning
intervention strategies.
Human leukemia cells cultured in the presence of vitamin D exhibited
a reduced rate of tumor growth when injected into mice. Cells grown in
vitamin D3 failed to form detectable tumors in 11 of 12 inoculated mice
(Wang et al. 1997). The anticarcinogenic properties of vitamin D, confronts
multiple stages of cancer development, including apoptosis, differentiation,
angiogenesis, and metastasis, as well as regulating the cell growth cycle
(van den Bemd et al. 2002).
Since vitamin D can cause calcium to be released from bones (a condition
referred to as hypercalcemia), large doses of vitamin D cannot be used
in patients whose medical history or genetics puts them at increased risk.
Using a combination of Vitamin D3 and vanadium (a metallic element) enables
vitamin D to retain its anticancer activity and vanadium addresses the
problem of hypercalcemia (Basak et al. 2000).
Rats were supplemented with vanadium or vitamin D3 or both vanadium and
D3 four weeks prior to induced liver cancer and continued thereafter until
the 20th week. After 20 weeks of supplementation, the vitamin D3-vanadium
combination had significantly reduced the number and size of abnormal
hepatic nodules. The combination also showed an additive effect, reducing
the number and size of hyperplastic nodes from 83.3% to 37.5%. In addition,
vanadium effectively blocked the entry of calcium into cells.
A modified form of vitamin D (referred to as a deltanoid) delays the
onset and reduces the number of skin cancers in laboratory mice. The microscopically
altered structure of vitamin D produced a potentially effective cancer
therapeutic. The vitamin D analog retains its anticancer profile but diminishes
the threat of hypercalcemia. The most effective of four analogs tested
was a doubly modified hybrid compound containing fluorine (Posner 2000).
During one study, mice painted with a chemical substance, inducing cancerous
tumors were concurrently the animals were given the deltanoid. After 20
weeks, the fluorine-containing analog had reduced the incidence of tumors
more than 28%, while the actual number fell 63% (Kensler et al. 2000).
Deltanoids are in the early stages of development and, unfortunately,
it may take 10 years before they become available (Guyton et al 2003).
It is possible that deltanoids could lessen the need for hormone treatments
or aggressive chemotherapy. Patients could theoretically stay on the treatment
for the remainder of their life to keep the cancer from advancing.
Studies indicate that moderate or severe hypovitaminosis D was present
in 66% of patients taking daily vitamin D in amounts less than the recommended
dosage for their age. Adults may need a minimum of 5 times the 200-IU
RDA, (or 1000 IU daily), to protect against cancer (Vieth 1999). Therapeutic
dosages of vitamin D typically range from 800-4000 IU a day. Monthly kidney
function blood tests (creatine, BUN, etc.) should be performed if daily
vitamin D intake exceeds 1400 IU. These tests are included in most standard
blood chemistry tests that cancer patients regularly perform to guard
against anemia and overt immunosuppression.
Food sources of vitamin D include egg yolks, organ meats, fortified dairy
products, butter, cod liver oil, and cold-water fish, such as salmon,
herring, and mackerel. Vitamin D enhancers are vitamins A and C, calcium,
magnesium, phosphorus, and choline. Antagonists are mineral oil, phenobarbital,
and laxatives.
Vitamin E--is an antioxidant that can protect smokers, reduces radiation
damage, potentiates chemotherapy, and inhibits many types of cancers
The inhibitory role of vitamin E in the growth of a number of human tumor
cells, as well as its defensive functions in overcoming treatment-induced
toxicity have been examined. The impact of vitamin E (perhaps acting through
its antioxidant strengths) is significant, as evidenced by the following
studies:
- After examining 29,000 male smokers in Finland, researchers found
that high blood levels of alpha-tocopherol reduced the incidence of
lung cancer by approximately 19%. The relationship appears stronger
among younger persons and among those with less cumulative smoke exposure.
These findings suggest that high levels of alpha-tocopherol, if present
during the early critical stages of tumorigenesis, may inhibit lung
cancer development (Woodson et al. 1999).
- A combination of vitamin E and pentoxifylline (PTX), a drug that
inhibits abnormal platelet aggregation, allowing more blood to reach
irradiated areas, resulted in a 50% regression of superficial radiation-induced
fibrosis (the proliferation of fibrous connective tissue) in half of
the patients studied (Gottlober et al. 1996; Delanian 1998). A suggested
dosage is 800 mg a day of PTX and 1000 IU per day of vitamin E.
- An anti-melanoma effect obtained from vitamin E succinate in vivo
has been reported (Malafa et al. 2002).
- Gamma-tocopherol inhibits COX-2 activity, demonstrating anti-inflammatory
properties (Jiang et al. 2001; Life Extension Magazine 2002).
- The use of vitamin E, in combination with vitamins A and C, led to
a four-fold reduction in p53 mutations (Brotzman et al. 1999). This
is an extremely important finding because p53 mutations indicate a more
malignant, aggressive form of cancer.
- Men with a high intake of vitamin E are 65% less likely to develop
colorectal adenomas (precursors to colon cancer) compared to men with
low vitamin E intake (Tseng et al. 1996).
- Lower morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer in men taking
50 mg of synthetic alpha-tocopherol daily. Subsequent testing determined
gamma-tocopherol to be superior, however, to alpha-tocopherol in terms
of tumor cell inhibition (Moyad et al. 1999). Men in the highest fifth
of the distribution for gamma-tocopherol had a five-fold reduction in
the risk of developing prostate cancer compared to those in the lowest
fifth. In addition, statistically significant protection from high levels
of selenium and alpha-tocopherol occurred only when gamma-tocopherol
concentrations were also high (Helzlsourer et al. 2000).
- Vitamin E's mode of efficacy in regard to prostate protection: Vitamin
E interferes with two proteins (the receptor for testosterone and prostate-specific
antigen [PSA]). The fewer androgen receptors there are on a prostate
cancer cell, the less capable the remaining receptors are of turning
on genes that stimulate prostate cancer growth and progression. PSA
serves as a good marker molecule for androgen receptor activity (Mercola
2002b).
- Tocotrienols, quite similar to a tocopherol (but for the addition
of an unsaturated tail in its chemical structure), accumulate in adipose
tissues, including mammary glands. If a cell becomes diseased, the tocotrienol
is prepared for action, ready to inhibit growth and regulate aberrant
cellular activity at onset. Curiously, the more cancerous the cell,
the more susceptible it is to tocotrienols. Scientists apparently have
been focusing upon the wrong form of vitamin E (the tocopherols), which
show little protection against breast cancer. Tocotrienols appear to
inhibit proliferation of human breast cancer cells by as much as 50%
(Nesaretnam et al. 1998). Results suggest that tocotrienols are effective
inhibitors of both estrogen receptor-negative and estrogen receptor-positive
cells and that combination with tamoxifen should be considered as a
possible improvement in breast cancer therapy. This strategy could significantly
reduce the amount of tamoxifen required to affect the cancer (Guthrie
et al. 1997).
- Cortisol (associated with poorer survival) and IL-6 (a negative marker
for various cancers) were significantly lower in laboratory animals
that received alpha-tocopherol before a cortisol-IL-6 challenge (Webel
et al. 1998).
| Vitamin E |
Chemotherapeutic Agent |
Combination with Vitamin E |
| 47% growth inhibition |
Bleomycin, 46% tumor reduction |
71% reduction |
| |
5-FU, 37% tumor reduction |
85% reduction |
| |
Adriamycin, 58% tumor reduction |
88% reduction |
| |
Cisplatin, 57% tumor reduction |
82% reduction |
A suggested vitamin E dosage is from 400-1200 IU a day of alpha-tocopherol
together with gamma E tocopherol. For optimal results, use 80% alpha-tocopherol
and 20% gamma-tocopherol. A tocotrienol dosage is 240 mg each day. Good
food sources of vitamin E are cold-pressed vegetable oils, wheat germ,
eggs, dark green vegetables, nuts, brown rice, and butter.
Vitamin K--is a growth regulator, promotes apoptosis, and decreases pro-inflammatory
cytokines
A novel form of vitamin K that appears extremely promising in the treatment
of primary liver cancer, a type notoriously resistant to chemotherapy
has been discovered by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer
Institute (UPCI). The research published in the Journal of Biological
Chemistry described an innovative approach to treat, and possibly
prevent, cancer by triggering apoptosis (Ni et al.1998).
The UPCI team found that a vitamin K analog, Compound 5 (CPD5), causes
an imbalance in the normal activity of enzymes that controls the addition
or removal of small molecules (phosphate groups) from proteins inside
cells. Specifically, CPD5 blocks the activity of enzymes (protein-tyrosine
phosphatases) that normally remove phosphate groups from selected proteins
inside liver cancer cells. CPD5, however, does not interfere with another
group of enzymes called protein tyrosine-kinases, which add phosphate
groups to the same proteins. The result is an excess of tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins, which triggers a variety of activities within cells, including
the shutting down and subsequent death of the cell.
It may be possible to remove some individuals from liver transplant waiting
lists if CPD5 is as effective in humans as it is experimentally. However,
the vitamin K compound is not limited to killing liver cancer; in tissue
culture the compound was also effective against melanoma and breast cancers.
Although the new vitamin K is not in clinical testing at this time, clients
and physicians may contact the UPCI's Cancer Information and Referral
Service at (800) 237-4PCI (4724) or (412) 624-1115 for periodic updates
regarding the treatment. Inquirers can also visit the university's website
at http://www.upci.upmc.edu.
Vitamin K compounds inhibited IL-6 production by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated
fibroblasts, which are recognized as rich sources of cytokines (Reddi
et al. 1995). This finding has significant anticancer implications because
over-expression of IL-6 is intricately involved in the inflammatory process,
bone resorption, the activation of telomerase, and cancer proliferation.
A suggested vitamin K dosage is 10 mg a day. Interesting research relating
to the use of vitamin K concurrent with anticoagulant therapy (not usually
a recommended practice) appears in the protocol Cardiovascular
Disease: Comprehensive Analysis in the section dedicated to vitamin
K.
OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING PATIENT OUTCOME
What Should Cancer Patients Eat?
For a cancer patient who appreciates the importance of a properly planned
diet, the task is daunting. The diversity of the population minimizes
the likelihood of a universal diet; nonetheless, most diets are hyped
as being nutritionally correct for everyone. This section explores dietary
variables, conceding that many generalities exist, that is, eat organic
when available and eat on schedule to avoid blood glucose swings. Select
foods characterized by color and texture. Avoid synthetic and refined
foods: white flour products and sugar as well as trans fats (those fats
altered by overheating, hydrogenation, and refining). Avoiding well-done
meats and exposure to heterocyclic amines (formed during high temperature
cooking) eliminates another significant cancer source (Zheng et al. 1998).
Tumors are primarily obligate glucose metabolizers, meaning they require
sugar for survival. Even though the brain normally uses high amounts of
glucose, hepatomas (a tumor of the liver) and fibrosarcomas (a sarcoma
that contains fibrous connective tissue) consume roughly as much glucose
as the brain. Some Americans continuously satisfy cancer's appetite, ingesting
as much as 295 pounds of sugar a year.
Nobel laureate Otto Warburg, Ph.D., discovered in 1955 that cancer cells
use glucose for fuel. But glucose accomplishes another strategic maneuver
that strongly favors the cancer: it immobilizes internal defenses, the
actions of the immune system. A study involving 10 healthy human volunteers
assessed fasting blood glucose levels and the phagocytic index of neutrophils,
a type of white blood cell. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, honey, and orange
juice all significantly decreased the capacity of neutrophils to engulf
bacteria. A diet structured away from sugars deprives cancer of its energy
and increases the reliability of the immune response.
Dr. Jeff Bland advises selecting foodstuffs low on the glycemic index
to avoid gratifying the tumor's appetite. The glycemic index lists the
relative speed at which different foods are digested and raise blood sugar
levels. Each food is compared to the effect of the same amount of pure
glucose on the body's blood sugar curve. Glucose itself has a glycemic
index rating of 100. Foods that are broken down and raise blood glucose
levels quickly have higher ratings. The closer to 100, the more the food
resembles glucose. The lower the rating, the more gradually that food
affects blood sugar levels.
Common foods have the following glycemic ratings: baked potatoes, 95;
white bread, 95; mashed potatoes, 90; chocolate candy bar, 70; corn, 70;
boiled potatoes, 70; bananas, 60; white pasta, 55; peas, 50; unsweetened
fruit juice, 40; rye bread, 40; lentils, 30; soy, 15; green vegetables;
and tomatoes, < 15.
Note: The
glycemic index should not be relied upon without factoring in the glycemic
load, which is the glycemic index of a food times its carbohydrate content
in grams, a concept developed at Harvard School of Public Health in 1997.
Carrots, for instance, have a high glycemic index, but a very low glycemic
load. This means that carrots consumed in moderation usually do not present
a problem. Refer to the Obesity protocol for complete information about
the glycemic index load.
An admonition, based more on folk medicine than scientific certainty,
to avoid the white foods (all sugar-containing foods, as well as rice,
and white flour and flour-based products) appears to have validity when
applied to the glycemic index. A diet structured principally around carbohydrates
that promotes hyperglycemia (high blood sugar level) and hyperinsulinemia
(high blood insulin level) provides an environment that feeds the fire
of cancer. High blood insulin levels drive protein tyrosine kinase (leading
to cell division) and high blood glucose metabolically feeds cancer cells.
On the other hand, a diet centered on fiber-, vitamin-, and mineral-rich
foods that cause no blood glucose rise or insulin rush is an excellent
target for healthy eating.
The diseases such as obesity and diabetes mellitus (often characterized
by hyperinsulinemia) are associated with an increased risk of endometrial,
colorectal, and breast cancers. The mechanisms underlying insulin-mediated
neoplasias appear to include enhanced DNA synthesis (with the resultant
tumor cell growth), inhibited apoptosis, and an altered sex hormone milieu.
The reduced insulin levels seen with physical activity, weight loss, and
a high fiber diet may in fact account for the decreased cancer incidence
observed in individuals who maintain normal glucose and insulin levels
(Gupta et al. 2002). Comment: Reducing blood insulin levels may result
in remarkable improvements in men with prostate disease, with a concurrent
drop in PSA levels (Hsing et al 2001).
Unfortunately, glucose modulation is an under-utilized component of cancer
treatment. Some aspects of traditional treatments actually contribute
to higher blood levels of glucose. For example, consider hospital meals,
often favoring sugar-based foodstuffs. In addition, if the patient is
on an IV solution, the infusion is largely dextrose based, feeding the
cancer and perpetuating its growth.
The American Cancer Society believes that 30% of all cancer is due to
inadequate consumption of vegetables and fruits. About 91% of Americans
fail to achieve target recommendations, that is, 5 vegetable servings
a day or 2-3 pounds a week. Asians who consume from 15-20 servings of
fruits and vegetables a day have a much lower incidence of some cancers.
Vegetables of the cruciferous family isolate the anticarcinogenic constituents
of Brassica plants. Glucosinolates (appearing in cruciferous vegetables)
can inhibit, retard, or even reverse experimental multistage carcinogenesis
(Fimognari et al. 2002). As enzymatic processes hydrolyze glucosinolates,
isothiocyanates are released, including sulphoraphane. Sulphoraphane wields
a strong arm against cancer, promoting apoptosis, inducing Phase II detoxification
enzymes, increasing p53 and participating in the regulatory mechanisms
of the cell's growth cycle. Necrosis (localized death of diseased tissues)
is typically observed after prolonged exposure to elevated doses of sulphoraphane.
|